Research

The science behind
variable resistance.

Published research has examined how variable resistance influences strength, movement velocity, power, and force distribution through a lift.

The studies below highlight findings most relevant to the training principles behind PowerCurve.

About this research

These publications evaluate variable-resistance training methods and related performance outcomes. They do not evaluate PowerCurve equipment directly.

This is a selected collection of research relevant to the training concepts behind the system, not an exhaustive systematic review.

01 · Evidence topic

Strength & maximum force.

Can variable resistance contribute to greater long-term strength development?

Lin et al. · 2022Systematic review & meta-analysis

Training adaptations

A 14-study review found greater gains in maximal strength with variable resistance

Across 14 studies, variable resistance produced greater improvements in maximal strength than constant resistance overall.

Results varied with factors including training experience and exercise intensity.

Study context: The advantage was not identical across every subgroup, and the review does not establish one optimal percentage of elastic resistance.

Reference & source

Lin et al. (2022). Effects of Variable-Resistance Training Versus Constant-Resistance Training on Maximum Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(14):8559.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148559

Li et al. · 2026Systematic review & meta-analysis

Training adaptations

A newer analysis found long-term advantages in maximal strength and jump distance

The review reported small pooled advantages for variable resistance in long-term maximal strength and jump distance, with standardized effects ranging from 0.28 to 0.37 across those outcomes.

Study context: Results varied with equipment and loading proportion, reinforcing that how variable resistance is configured can influence the training response.

Reference & source

Li et al. (2026). Comparison of Variable Resistance and Free Weight Training on Long-Term and Acute Effects on Different Assessments of Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 40(2):e211–e223.

DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005369

02 · Evidence topic

Velocity & power.

What changes when elastic resistance is added to explosive lifting?

Shi et al. · 2022Systematic review & meta-analysis

Immediate exercise responses

Variable resistance increased mean velocity and mean power across pooled studies

Across 16 studies involving 207 participants, variable resistance produced higher mean velocity and mean power than constant resistance.

Evidence certainty was rated moderate for mean velocity and low for mean power.

Study context: Results depended in part on how loads were matched and which performance measure was evaluated. These findings describe immediate exercise responses rather than long-term training adaptations.

Reference & source

Shi et al. (2022). Acute effects of variable resistance training on force, velocity, and power measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 10:e13870.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13870

Masel & Maciejczyk · 2024Randomized crossover study

Immediate exercise responses

Accommodating resistance improved short-term jump performance in trained lifters

Fifteen strength-trained men completed trap-bar deadlifts with and without accommodating resistance.

Ninety seconds later, squat-jump performance improved following the combined free-weight and band condition, while the free-weight-only condition did not produce a significant improvement.

Study context: This was a small acute experiment and does not establish long-term training effects or superiority across training programs.

Reference & source

Masel & Maciejczyk (2024). Accommodating resistance is more effective than free weight resistance to induce post-activation performance enhancement in squat jump performance after a short rest interval. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness. 22(1):59–65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.12.001

03 · Evidence topic

Loading through the range of motion.

How does elastic resistance change where force is produced during a lift?

Andersen et al. · 2020Acute laboratory study

Movement mechanics

Elastic resistance changed the distribution of force through the deadlift

In 16 resistance-trained men, band-resisted deadlifts produced higher average force in the upper half of the movement than free weights alone.

Free weights produced higher average force than the band-resisted condition in the lower half.

Study context: The findings demonstrate that resistance configuration can change force demands at different positions in a movement under a specific loading setup.

Reference & source

Andersen et al. (2020). Acute Effects of Elastic Bands as Resistance or Assistance on EMG, Kinetics, and Kinematics During Deadlift in Resistance-Trained Men. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2:598284.

DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2020.598284

Why control matters

The setup matters.

The research makes one practical point especially clear: variable resistance is not one fixed training stimulus.

The response can change with exercise selection, elastic contribution, loading percentage, how loads are matched, and where resistance is applied through the movement.

PowerCurve is built around controlling those variables.

Plate load and band load can be adjusted independently. Band resistance can be measured, documented, and repeated from session to session.

That gives coaches a measurable, repeatable way to program accommodating resistance.

Explore PowerCurve

From evidence to application.

See how PowerCurve turns variable resistance into a measurable, repeatable, controllable training system.